Skip to main content
Youzu
Catalogue benchmark

Run it on your catalogue.

A paid, fixed-scope benchmark on the records creating the most operational drag. You set the acceptance criteria. We show the decisions, evidence, and review load before any production rollout.

Talk through a benchmark→See it on real products

Your benchmark scorecard

The decision, with the evidence.

Your acceptance criteriaYou set them

A representative set of the catalogue records that create the most operational drag.

  • Product, family, variant, offer, duplicate
  • Attributes, taxonomy, and policy decisions
  • Evidence, confidence, and review route

Read-only first. Your team reviews the exceptions, not every record.

A benchmark is not a demo

Measure the decisions before you buy the rollout.

A product title is not a product decision. Your benchmark tests the records that are hardest to identify, group, enrich, moderate, and publish with confidence.

Editorial illustration showing diverse catalogue records connected through evidence to one resolved product decision
Your scope

Start with the records that make work pile up.

Choose one catalogue workflow and a representative set of difficult records. We agree the question before any output is judged, so a polished sample cannot hide the edge cases that matter in production.

  • One category or workflow, chosen by your team
  • Criteria written before the benchmark begins
  • A scorecard that separates accepted output from exceptions
Public Snoonu catalogue environment showing product records with images, names, brands, and categories
A public catalogue environment to explore
What is evaluated

Decisions, not better-written errors.

Youzu reads feeds and images together to resolve the product record before content is generated around it. The benchmark makes every decision reviewable, including the cases the system should not decide alone.

  • Product, family, variant, offer, and duplicate resolution
  • Attributes, taxonomy, media, and policy outcomes
  • Confidence, source evidence, and a route for uncertain cases
Public moderation environment showing catalogue records routed with policy reasons and review outcomes
Evidence and review routes stay visible
Read-only start

Your team keeps the hard decisions.

The benchmark starts read-only. High-confidence output can be measured against your criteria, while uncertain or policy-sensitive cases arrive with the rule, the observation, and the supporting evidence already attached.

  • Your thresholds determine what is ready for acceptance
  • Your reviewers see the reason before they decide
  • No production write-back is required to prove the workflow

What you keep

A scorecard your team can use to make the next decision.

Accepted outputWhich records meet your criteria and why.

Review loadWhich cases still need a person and what they need to see.

Production scopeThe workflow you would turn on first if the benchmark clears.

Editorial illustration of catalogue records moving through an evidence-led decision and human-review route
FAQ

Common questions

The next step

Bring the hard records. Keep the criteria.

We will scope the workflow, the representative data, and the acceptance criteria with you before the benchmark begins.

Talk through a benchmark See it on real products